Bridging the Gap: Critical Theory in Everyday Conversations
As I delve deeper into critical theory, discussions often pivot to topics like feminism, queer theory, and post-colonial theory. While feminism is somewhat recognized, the intricacies of these subjects seem as esoteric to the general populace as Quantum Theory (QT)—where only a select few experts and advanced students truly engage with the material. The rest might glean their QT knowledge from Marvel movies rather than academic texts—a simplification, certainly, but one that illustrates my point.
Logic and QT share a commonality in their specialization; both are understood and researched by a select few. We introduce logic and elements of logical thinking through critical thinking courses to a broader student body, yet this exposure barely scratches the surface of advanced logical concepts, analogous to the complexity of QT. At university, we often start teaching logic from the basics, recognizing the lack of prior education in this discipline.
However, this post centers on critical theory rather than logic. In reflecting on my experiences, I've realized that critical theory is more akin to logic than QT in academia. Few delve into its in-depth research, and it rarely makes its way into general education before university level. Yet, claiming that critical theory is entirely absent from pre-university education would be an oversight. Efforts to incorporate its principles into the curriculum exist, and some of my previous work has focused on integrating feminist critiques into general education—not to indoctrinate students with theory but to enrich their development and understanding of societal dynamics.
Critical theory's educational value lies not in memorizing theories and facts but in cultivating well-rounded citizens aware of their societal positions, power dynamics, and how to engage constructively in their communities, allowing for diverse perspectives to thrive.
The challenge, however, remains in discussing critical theory with those unfamiliar with its depth and scope. For many, their understanding of feminism, for example, may be limited to the caricatured versions criticized by figures like Jordan Peterson, rather than a nuanced comprehension. This misrepresentation does as much for educating the public on feminism as Marvel movies do for QT or Star Trek does for logic.
The dilemma we face is not just about making critical theory more accessible but finding effective ways to engage in meaningful conversations about it—before being prematurely dismissed with a wave of misguided criticism and a hint of cheap Chardonnay.
